๐Ÿต๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ ๐—ถ๐—ฃ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿญ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ž! ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๐——๐—ผ๐—ปโ€™๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ!๐Ÿ”ฅ

What is the best phone camera in 2019?

To cut to our quick conclusions, we found the Google Pixel 4 (from ยฃ669) to be our recommended all-rounder of the five phones, our pick for low-light photography and thus the best phone camera, according to our pro photographer. None of these phones came out top in all areas, but Googleโ€™s latest does reach some impressive heights.

However, our iPhone 11 Pro (from ยฃ1,049) testing was the most striking. It was arguably the weakest in controlled conditions, but tends to produce consistently eyeball-pleasing results out on the street. It's the best phone camera for street photography.

Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Apple's eye view is stylised and works on the street

Main camera: 12MP | Aperture: f/1.8 | OIS: Yes (dual)
Telephoto: 12MP | Aperture: f/2.0 | OIS: Yes | Zoom: 2x optical
Ultra-wide: 12MP | Aperture: f/2.4 | OIS: No | FOV: 120ยฐ

iPhones are usually considered to be less processing-heavy than other phones, in part because they donโ€™t tend to use egregious over-sharpening, the simplest kind of processing to identify. However, the iPhone 11 Pro (from ยฃ1,049) guides the contrast and colour of its images with a heavier hand than any of the other Androids.

โ€œTheyโ€™ve upped the contrast to give the illusion of sharpness.โ€ Scheinberg says of the iPhoneโ€™s studio shoot image as we looked over the photos on a colorimeter-calibrated MacBook. โ€œThis is quite intense, thereโ€™s so much processing.โ€

This isnโ€™t the kind of processing that leaves objects with a white crust of sharpening, or textures with a wholly unrealistic watercolour-like effect, though. iPhone 11 Pro images look stylised, punchy and โ€œready to postโ€. But Apple makes certain choices for you, and it blocks off others, if youโ€™re the kind of photographer who edits images after taking them. Our iPhone studio shots also had an unwanted greenish wash to them.

Many people donโ€™t want to edit their shots, though, and even more wonโ€™t realise the extent to which an image can be salvaged or improved by editing, using phone apps let alone Photoshop. And an iPhone avoids you trashing photos because they donโ€™t look good at first glance.

Shooting our dog model against a brick wall demonstrated this most clearly. The Androidsโ€™ images all look slightly anaemic next to the iPhoneโ€™s. It brought out the orange-auburn patches of the little chapโ€™s markings, and kept the dark areas looking dark more successfully than any other. The result is a much richer looking image that appears to have greater depth, warmth and clarity.

You can bring this back to the other phonesโ€™ images in the edit, but with an iPhone you donโ€™t have to. And thatโ€™s important. โ€œItโ€™s like it just does the work for you,โ€ says Scheinberg.